Skip to content
What We Do

We turn digital-rights concerns into legal strategy, public tools, and organized pressure.

Institutet For Juridik Och Internet works where internet policy becomes real life: in schools, newsrooms, civic groups, local chapters, and legislative debates that decide who gets protected online.

At A Glance

Four connected forms of work, one public mission.

We do not treat legal analysis, civic education, and organizing as separate lanes. They reinforce each other so communities can understand risk, respond quickly, and push institutions toward accountable decisions.

24 briefings, workshops, and legal explainers delivered each quarter
4 core workstreams running from research to public action
1 shared goal: rights that remain enforceable when systems move fast
Core Workstreams

What we do in practice.

Community Defense And Chapter Support

We help local organizers translate fast-moving digital-rights issues into chapter meetings, volunteer roles, local briefings, and multilingual public outreach.

When a harmful decision lands, local communities should not have to invent their response from zero.

Public Education And Practical Tools

We build workshops, explainers, classroom materials, and small-group sessions that make digital law understandable to students, journalists, teachers, and civic groups.

The goal is not abstraction. The goal is to leave people with concrete next steps, stronger language, and better evidence for advocacy.

Campaign Strategy And Policy Pressure

We coordinate petitions, coalition messaging, public comment drives, parliamentary outreach, and media-ready campaign materials designed to move institutions under scrutiny.

We focus on leverage: where public attention, legal argument, and organized participation can shift the outcome.

How We Work

We start with the people most exposed to the decision.

Our work often begins with a school community facing intrusive technology, a newsroom receiving a legal demand, or organizers trying to understand a platform decision that hit them without warning.

From there, we map the issue across three layers: the immediate harm, the governing rules, and the pressure points that can force a better response. That keeps our work grounded in actual conditions instead of abstract commentary.

Response Model

A fast response only matters if it is structured.

01

Assess

We review the legal posture, timeline, and institutional actors involved, then identify where rights are weakest and what evidence is missing.

02

Translate

We turn technical or legal language into public materials that affected people, volunteers, and partner groups can use immediately.

03

Mobilize

We connect chapters, educators, reporters, and coalition partners so the issue reaches both decision-makers and the people living with the consequences.

04

Sustain

We document what changed, where gaps remain, and how communities can keep pressure on the institutions that made the original choice.

Where This Shows Up

The work is visible in public institutions, not just policy documents.

  • School and library briefings on privacy, AI procurement, and student data safeguards.
  • Newsroom support when reporters need fast legal context for surveillance or platform accountability stories.
  • Volunteer training for petitions, canvassing, translation, and local outreach tied to national campaigns.
  • Coalition work that helps lawmakers, committees, and civic partners understand the real-world cost of weak digital-rights protections.
In Action